ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
How to Participate
DISCUSSION TOPICS

December 2009:

Cognitive Enhancement
Waiting for a Transplant

November 2009:

End-of-Life Decisions

September 2009:

Genetically Modified Foods

PLEASE NOTE: This blog has a terms of use, which all visitors are encouraged to read and accept. If you have not read and accepted the terms of use, please do so now: click here.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Topic #4: The Ethics of Cognitive Enhancement - Essays

The Topic
Our society values achievement. Our employers extol the virtue of hard work, our professors encourage us to study harder, our coaches expect 110%, and the US Army attracts new recruits with the slogan “Be all you can be!” In the pursuit of excellence, we hire tutors and athletic trainers; we consult psychologists, dieticians, and personal finance consultants; we take piano lessons and enroll in SAT prep classes. And, some of us take drugs.

When baseball players turn to anabolic steroids to be all that they can be, we are appalled. We are also concerned when we read reports of college students using stimulants, such as Ritalin, to help them prepare for exams. What makes the pharmaceutical road to success morally suspect? Is there a difference between the use of drugs in athletics and in academics? Can we control the use of stimulants by college students? Should we? Read what Ben and Carl have to say about this issue, do a little research, and join the conversation.

The Essays
The following essays, written by students at the Germantown Academy, address the issue of the ethics of cognitive enhancement, whether in the form of steroids to enhance athletic performance or stimulants to boost academic achievement.

Tyler Kenny welcomes the development of brain-boosting drugs. He notes that the US military already relies on stimulants to improve the performance of critical forces and feels that these drugs would be an important aid to busy students and surgeons as well.

Victoria Edwards disagrees. She notes that cognitive enhancing drugs were developed for therapeutic purposes and argues that use by healthy individuals is morally wrong. She labels such use "cheating."

Jacob Olitsky does not feel that the use of brain-boosting drugs for the enhancement of healthy brains is inherently wrong but has two concerns about making such use legal. First, the side effects have not been sufficiently investigated. Second, until the drugs can be produced cheaply enough to be effectively available to all, their legalization would further widen the gap between the poor and the wealthy.

Where do you stand on this issue? Please join the conversation.

Cognitive Enhancement
by Tyler Kenny

Legalize Cheating?
by Victoria Edwards

Cognitive Enhancement
by Jacob Olitsky


» Click here to view the original assignment.

35 comments:

  1. 快樂的微笑是保持生命康健的唯一藥石,它的價值千萬,卻不要花費一文錢........................................

    ReplyDelete
  2. 以簡單的行為愉悅他人的心靈,勝過千人低頭禱告........................................

    ReplyDelete
  3. 河水永遠是相同的,可是每一剎那又都是新的。......................................................

    ReplyDelete
  4. 動不一定每一次都成功,但坐而不行,絕無任何成功可言.............................................

    ReplyDelete
  5. 想像是什麼並不重要,想像能做什麼才重要..............................

    ReplyDelete
  6. 在莫非定律中有項笨蛋定律:「一個組織中的笨蛋,恆大於等於三分之二。」.................................................................

    ReplyDelete
  7. 當一個人內心能容納兩樣相互衝突的東西,這個人便開始變得有價值了。............................................................

    ReplyDelete
  8. 安安唷~~幸運的日子送給妳(你)滿滿的幸福,也祝福你天天都開心唷..................................................................

    ReplyDelete
  9. 什麼樣的學習計畫並不重要,重要的是你是什麼樣的人。............................................................

    ReplyDelete
  10. 堅持是為著某種目的或目標,而持續不斷朝向既定方向努力的一種意念。..................................................

    ReplyDelete


The Philosophical Student, a blog sponsored by the Squire Family Foundation, is a digital-age agora where pre-college, college and graduate students and their teachers and professors, as well as parents, school administrators and all those interested in philosophy, can meet to discuss philosophical issues.

The Squire Family Foundation, a 501 (c)(3) organization, advocates that all pre-college students have the opportunity to study philosophy before graduating from high school.